Here is
the promise made by the editor, Diane Guerrero, at janelead.org regarding the
Meaning of JL's messages...
This screen-capture was made from the early homepage at janelead.org.
The report below will
show you examples that will help you to evaluate just how credible Diane Guerrero is, when
she gives these assurances to her site visitors. Is she keeping her word in the
modified SDV documents that she is presenting and selling?
|
A Radical
Reversal of Meaning
[first reported May 17, 2012]
in JL's
Revelation of Revelations 2nd Edition, 1701 SDV Edition |
The most
'scandalous' reversal of meaning to the messages of Jane Lead, that has been uncovered so
far, was to be found in DG's SDV modification of Jane Lead's Revelation of
Revelations - 1701 Edition.
We will first
describe what was changed, what it means, and then we
will show you the screen-captures that we have recorded to prove that DG implemented this
change. It was NOT a typographical error !
|
Near the end
of the authentic original 1st Edition is a sentence which reads: ...although each Saint may have a full Provision
and plentiful Portion of Spirit in themselves, so as they have no
dependance on another, yet love is freely communitive, and disperseth it self in great
variety, so as what one Saint is gifted and furnished with, the other may want of that
sort and kind, and so a heavenly Traffick and Correspondency may be maintained, feeding
and feasting with each other...etc.
|
DG has never
had an on-line SDV rendition of the 1st Edition, but her SDV modification of the 2nd
Edition of Jane Lead's Revelation of Revelations removes the word, "no" from the
above quote so that it reads: ...although
each Saint may have a full Provision and plentiful Portion of Spirit in themselves, so as
they have dependance on another, yet love is freely communicative...etc.— which reversal of meaning leaves the Saints dependent on each
other.
To quote from one letter that PTW received concerning this matter:
"It is
incredible how the removal of one two-letter word, (no), can destroy the meaning of the
truth. The changed sentence implies that the elected ones are dependent on each other
which is totally incorrect and negates the work of conversion from the Holy Spirit.
This shows how subtle Satan operates even unto deceiving of the elect if they are not
continually on guard."
"There
is a great difference between dependence and sharing. Every truly elected Saint is
complete in themselves and is led by Christ through the Holy Spirit, therefore has NO
dependence on another. 1John 26-29. Sharing is where some elected ones
are given revelations and visions and these are what they ought to share with one another
for upbuilding and encouragement. There are many scriptures showing that we
are dependent on Christ and the Holy Spirit and not what the imposter wrote."
The writer of
the above also urged that PTW make public the changes in the Spirit Deceiver's
Versions (SDV) of JL's works; we agree. It is time to bring what has been
hidden into the light.
So please
bear with us, as we show you in detail what you need to see in order for you to have the
information that we have gathered and what is apparent from it...and brethren, this was
NOT a typographical error on DG's part.
|
First,
here is an image of PTW's source-copy of the 1st Edition page containing this sentence so
you can see exactly how it reads in the authentic JL manuscript.
|
Second,
here is a screen-capture of the on-line transcription at PTW of the same 1st Edition
sentence. This is the copy that DG illegally used as the foundation text to build
her derivative version of the 2nd Edition. [More on that later in the report.]
|
Third,
here is DG's source-copy of the 2nd Edition page that contains the sentence of
interest...notice that the 2nd Edition original text still contains the word,
"no" !!
So it was a
conscious change to the original 1683 e-text by Diane Guerrero, a deliberate action on her
part, to remove the word "no", at the time that she first edited that sentence
for her published on-line version(s). We say versions because in 2009 DG posted to
her site an HTML version of the supposedly unedited 1701 text. Later she replaced it
with a PDF version of her modified SDV edition.
|
Fourth,
here is a screen-capture showing DG's title page next to her page containing the same
sentence of interest from DG's HTML file {mentioned above} of that supposedly
unedited version of the 2nd Edition, 1701 printing of The Revelation of
Revelations that she first posted online in 2009. Notice that she had already
removed the "no" at this very early stage.
|
Fifth,
before we leave her HTML file, let's look at side-by-side copies from PTW's 1st Edition (on
the LEFT) and DG's 2nd Edition (on the RIGHT) HTML files, focused on
the text surrounding the sentence with the reversed meaning but also showing the
underlying HTML code below each view of the text.
Do you see
any similarities? She copied the 1st Edition text and used it as the foundation to
build her 2nd Edition derivative. When she made that copy, she got the underlying
older HTML3 code syntax from PTW's e-file. It seems very clear that DG had
either opened, or copied and pasted from the PTW e-file of the 1683 Edition of Jane Lead's
Revelation of Revelations, and then made her changes and additions to it so as to
produce her SDV modification of the 2nd Edition. Either way, the older PTW code went
along, behind the scenes, so that it would be proof of the theft. {There is more
evidence of the theft of e-files in the report entitled, "Detailed Comparison of a
Copied File"}
As soon as DG
realized that her HTML versions were being examined and that her copyright violations were
thereby exposed and confirmed by the presence of PTW's underlying code, she began removing
the HTML versions from janelead.org and replacing them with PDF files so that
others could not detect the matching HTML codes that we had found in her SDV documents.
|
and...Sixth,
here is a screen-capture showing the same sentence from DG's replacement PDF file of Jane
Lead's Revelation of Revelations - 1701 Edition, SDV.
Notice that
the same reversal of meaning appears in the later PDF file. So there was no
inadvertent typographical error, no mistake on her part, other than to expect that
readers would not be shown the change. But the Lord is good; there is nothing hidden
that will not be uncovered in His timing.
And now you know... but there is more to tell... about DG's 2nd
Edition. [see below]
|
added material as of August, 2012
A Summary of New
Issues with DG's SDV Imposture of the Revelation of Revelations, 2nd. Edition,
1701.
When PTW was
preparing the authentic transcription of the Second Edition of JL's Revelation of
Revelations, which also went on-line at PTW in August of 2012, the methodology
applied was to use PTW's own copyrighted e-text, from the 1683 First Edition, as their
foundation, so that the 2nd Edition corrections could be applied and the new material
added to it; the resulting new e-text became the authentic transcription of the
original of the 2nd Edition.
This is a
valid method for PTW to use, but NOT so for DG, since the e-file of the 1683 edition was
and is copyrighted. Remember that DG never obtained a copy of the original 1683
manuscript of JL's The Revelation of Revelations; there was no SDV
edition of it; there was no upload of it to SCRIBD. The only place to find the
wording of the authentic 1683 edition, was at PTW, and that's where DG went for it when
she did her SDV of the 2nd Edition. There is no doubt that she copied the e-text
from PTW. We already showed you proof-examples of the copied HTML codes above in
this report and also in another report examining the details of the copied e-text from The
Heavenly Cloud Now Breaking. And now, here is additional new information, very
recently uncovered, that corroborates our earlier findings.
When the
authentic R of R 2nd Edition transcription at PTW was recently completed, we were
prompted to make one more pass through the entire document, this time comparing the last
free download, the "Special Preview" of DG's PDF file of the SDV
Second edition, with the authentic 2nd Edition e-text that PTW had just generated.
We were to compare the two documents, both generally and line-by-line.
Generally we
were to learn and reveal to you, just how true DG was to the original.
We found that
the order of presentation was changed by DG in her SDV edition; the names of two
parts of the original were changed by DG; a new Table of Contents was constructed by
DG which she inserted at the beginning; it included a part of the original that was
entitled 'Contents', which was to immediately precede the main message, and thus was
eliminated by DG altogether. It is also disturbing that DG chose to divide her SDV
2nd Edition into 261 paragraphs, when in reality, the authentic original has only 213
paragraphs. This is more evidence that DG was not true to the original, which you
can verify for yourself since PTW's authentic transcription is in the same order as the
original manuscript.
The
line-by-line comparison with the R of R 2nd Edition "Special
Preview" SDV revealed exactly why we were prompted to look at it and just what
we were sent there to see.
There,
sitting in DG's PDF file, were (and still are) a large number of whole segments of PTW's
copyrighted transcription of the 1683 e-text, left in tact - exactly the way it reads in
the 1st Edition! Apparently DG had either not finished her SDV editing of
PTW's e-text before she issued and accepted money for her "Special
Preview" SDV edition, or she did an incredibly sloppy job. DG had
overlooked eighty (80) specific, now documented, instances of the exact wording from PTW's
1683 e-text transcription that had not been correctly updated. She had not
finished updating those 80 instances of e-text to match what was called for in the 1701
manuscript original before she published her "Special Preview".
Not only did
DG leave those 80 new proof-examples of her violations of PTW's copyrights, but also there
were found to be six (6) more Changes of Meaning to the R of R 2nd Edition, SDV.
Additionally, at least twenty (20) typographical errors existed within the new
material of her SDV 2nd Edition — that is, within the added 2nd edition material
which DG had to type on her own.
Rather than
divulging further details, it seems appropriate for DG to go back and find all of these
for herself, if she has not done so already.
One more
new deception by DG to
be reported as of August, 2012:
A new
website, entitled spiritsday.org, which duplicates the content of janelead.org
has been created by DG. She sells the same illegal SDV editions there, offers
various "Studies" to you, invites you to pay her for the corresponding current
SDV edition so that you can follow her teaching, and then invites you to reward her for
her illegal activities. Please, do not knowingly join with her in the propagation of
these impostures. The evidence shows that the SDV documents are not true to the
messages from the Godhead that were spoken through Jane Lead.
~~~ End
Notice of August 2012 Update ~~~
|
Other
Reports of Changed Meaning
Other changes
to the meaning of the messages have been discovered and made known to us, so we have
placed a sampling of them in this on-line report. The changes to meaning that we
list below are each supported by a screen-shot of DG's modified SDV text from her on-line
PDF file at janelead.org (as of early May 2012 before it disappeared); you
will find enough information to go back to her SDV versions and confirm what we have
shared. We have listed, along with each change of meaning, any comment that came
with the report.
|
Changes of meaning in JL's Heavenly Cloud Now Breaking SDV Edition |
[HC 1:5
SDV] In the 3rd paragraph of "The Introduction" of the original
1681 manuscript, there is an emphatic statement by Michael, the Prince of the new and
everlasting Covenant which reads "Therefore in order hereunto, do thou signify what way must be
followed for Restitution...".
(The change is shown below in a screen-shot from DG's SDV edition.)
The SDV edition has fractured the text into multiple paragraphs, then severed this
command of Michael from his preceding message, by beginning a new paragraph, which only
reads "Therefore signify
what way must be followed for restitution..." greatly diluting the emphasis and reason for the directions from
the Lord which follow. This is a typical example of the dilution and confusion that
can be introduced by such meddling with the original content of the text.
When compared to the original 1681, 1st Edition of The Heavenly
Cloud, DG has taken many liberties with her SDV edition, often interrupting the
continuity of thought of many passages and interjecting her own subject headings that were
not in the original.
When Jane Lead published her original 1701, 2nd Edition of The
Heavenly Cloud, she did add four main section titles.
JL's first
section mark and title is, §
I. Of the Spiritual Dying.
Her second
section mark and title is, § II. Here follows the
Resurrection.
Her third
section mark and title is, § III. Here
follows the Tract of Ascension
JL's fourth
section mark and title is, § IV. Upon Ascension and
Descension.
Diane Guerrero, the editor at janelead.org, saw fit to break her SDV Edition
of The Heavenly Cloud into 42 marked sections compared to
Jane Lead and her editor, Francis Lee's 4 — thus adding to
the dilution of the messages and the confusion of many readers.
|
[HC 1:23 SDV]
Here the message is elaborating more on the whole scope Of the Spiritual Dying.
Speaking of the Natural and Bodily Sense which we all share, the original of both
the 1st and 2nd Edition of The Heavenly Cloud reads here: "This sense indeed is apt and fit for such
an inferior mortal State as we are fallen into. A low and earthly
Sense doth well agree with a low and earthly World." (The change is shown
below in a screen-shot from DG's SDV edition.)
DG's SDV version changed the word, "inferior"
to "interior", thus changing and confusing the
meaning.
|
[HC 1:24 SDV]
The text speaks of our goal to obtain a state in which "we may have a broad
open sight of an express Glory". Within the message there is text describing that our
sensible part must be suspended and laid as in a dead sleep, {trance-like}
during such a time. A sentence within both the 1st and 2nd Edition of The
Heavenly Cloud reads thus:"But that which is the most certain Knowledge, and Sight, and
Hearing is, when the whole sensitive motion of the Soul, Spirit, and Body is entered into
a Transical, Eternal Nothingness." (The change is shown
below in a screen-shot from DG's SDV edition.)
DG's SDV edition blatantly changed the word, "Transical", to "transient" — again adulterating the
meaning.
Further on,
the message of the originals goes on to tell us why we must enter into this transical
state, and what is the more sure way for it ... "even through the cessation
{ceasing} of the outward senses". (The change is shown below in a screen-shot from DG's SDV
edition.)
DG's SDV edition replaces the
word, "cessation", with the word, "sensation" so that it now reads "sensation
of the senses"...another changed message!!
|
[HC 2:4
SDV] vs. PTW original of both the 1st Edition and the 2nd Edition, section entitled
"Here Follows the Resurrection" 5th paragraph. #2 — The original
speaks of "a high graduated
sound Wisdom", that is to
displace what JL calls "the subtil Spirit of Reason" in us. (The change is
shown below in a screen-shot from DG's SDV edition.)
DG changed this phrase to
"a high "gradient" sound Wisdom"...changing the
inherent meaning and implications of the message leaving the Spirit of Reason to live and
work as usual.
|
[HC 2:12 SDV]
One example of DG's change of "Sion" King to "Zion"
King". (One such change is shown below in a screen-shot from DG's SDV edition.)
This replacement of Zion for Sion, DG applied 7 times throughout the entire
SDV Heavenly Cloud document...removing a precious gateway to the deeper meaning
which JL's messages had opened.
|
[HC 3:1
SDV] Speaking of the ascending soul, the phrase in the original reads "Oh what Angelical Sounds, and winding up
Powers, that do make a Soul all restless, till it comes to its own prepared Mansion!" (The change is shown
below in a screen-shot from DG's SDV edition.)
DG changed the word, "Mansion" to the word, "motion" — turning the Soul's arrival at
its destination into a continuous state of movement!...reversing the meaning!
|
[HC 3:21 SDV]
This change was applied to the original text of the last full paragraph before the
set of verses entitled, "The Ascension". The original reads,
"For something I do see
breaking forth as the Light of a new Day and by the great Alpha and Omega
it is testified, that what by his Spirit hath been revealed, shall not go off as a dead Scene,
shewn only in the literal description and so folded up again." This is the first sentence of
an important message that was being conveyed through JL. It is a long message. (The
change is shown below in a screen-shot from DG's SDV edition.)
When DG modified this text, she
changed the word," Scene" to "seine", followed immediately by her own
interrupting notation (circled in red) directing the reader to a footnote of
her own commentary and proffering a teaching of her own — thus diverting and
distracting the reader from the importance of the current message and surely impacting the
meaning of the message. DG further fractured the teaching right in the middle of a
sentence and began a new paragraph, [HC 3:22 SDV], thus further preventing the complete
thought of the message from registering fully with the reader. What else would we
expect from an agent of the author of confusion, distraction, and subversion?
|
[HC 4:7
SDV] Again another fractured teaching. Part of section IV of the original
text, entitled "Upon Ascension and Descension" which deals with the
actions to be performed when an elected one is finally fixed with the glorified body of
the Holy Ghost and again descends to do the assigned works of the same. Particularly
troubling is a change within an original sentence that reads, "A rich Prize shall be possessed, even such
a living stock for subsistence, as shall be blessed with the multiplying
Power of the Holy Ghost."
(The change is shown below in a screen-shot from DG's SDV edition.)
DG changed the word, "subsistence"
to "substance" in her SDV edition, thus changing
the meaning of the promise of provision and implies the use of the gift for an opposite,
worldly end. Who gave her the authority to change the words from the Godhead? Is
there any doubt?
|
Finally,
consider seriously, in regards to all that we have shown you, whether Diane Guerrero
fulfilled her promise to leave Jane Lead's messages "untouched"? Was she
telling the truth when she said...
...we think you will agree, she
did not keep her promise; she did not speak the truth.
So rather than
believing what she said, let us be convinced by what she has done. |
All
things being considered, it certainly appears that Diane Guerrero boldly lied to all of us
when she promised that she would be faithful to God and to Jane Lead, and that JL's
messages, themselves, would be left untouched. She not only touched them, she
violated them in a destructive way.
If we
have accomplished our task, and if you have viewed all 5 of the evidentiary Reports from
the Fair Warning page, it should be clear to you by now that the promises, words, and
works of Diane Guerrero are not to be trusted, nor should DG's SDV editions be given your
credibility, your recommendation, your resources or your precious time.
The god,
to whom DG has been faithful, is the god of this world, disguised as an angel of light, on
a mission to destroy what threatens his kingdom. Are we surprised?
Links to the other evidentiary
Reports can to be found at the bottom of
the Fair Warning Reports Page.
|
Back
to: The Fair Warning Reports Page |
Back
to: Index of Jane Lead Manuscripts |